[Zoobank-list] zoobank prototype

[Geoff Read]

I understand the desire to link all published data to the correct name. 
Someone out there has published something vaguely biological and it 
contains a misspelled name of a species. Obviously this is going to be 
important information, and the species was accurately identified — yeah 
right (after all they carelessly got the name wrong), but I shouldn't 
prejudge it. Iubio and Ion can index it. Absolutely fine by me.

But what has this to do with a register of taxa names? Why should anyone 
  need to devote any time at all to weeding out this rubbish name from 
such a register when there is no logic to it being there? It simply 
doesn't have any of the necessary indicators requiring it to be taken 
seriously by a taxonomist, the most obvious of which would seem to be 
its appearance within a taxonomic context.

On a positive note — I am fairly confident that the author and 'original 
description reference (article title) of animal species newly described 
since 1978 are accurately represented in the current ZooBank search 
interface under the 'name info' tag.

As for the rest of the records ported from ION, well they are a very 
mixed bag indeed. I would like to see them disappear, because they are 
only unverified possibilities of names.


Cheers,

Geoff
-- 
   Geoff Read <g.read at niwa.co.nz>
    http://www.annelida.net/


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.